Security Risks From Inverters In Focus After US Report

Highlights :

  • While it is obvious to all that a solar surge without China based products is almost impossible, reports of undocumented items in some inverters in the US should drive Chinese manufacturers to dispel any doubts quickly.
Security Risks From Inverters In Focus After US Report

While Chinese dominance of the solar panel industry has been well documented and understood, most people tend to bypass the huge presence of Chinese inverter firms in the solar market. Even if we consider key markets like India or the US and even Europe, the focus of supporting local manufacturing as well as creating tariff barriers has been on the module manufacturing chain, rather than the power electronics side of it, ie, solar inverters.

All that might change, with reports of undocumented components found in some China origin models in the US during security checks. The story, originally broken by news agency Reuters, says that the discovery has promoted U.S. energy officials to reassess the security risks posed by Chinese-made components in renewable energy infrastructure. Risks of a grid collapse or blackouts from remote shut down caused by such ‘trojans’ has also been raised, although we would consider it a little too extreme at this stage.

Until now, inverters have usually escaped the spotlight thanks to their relatively smaller share of project costs (well under 10%), the immense value Chinese majors have bought to the table by offering cheaper options to buyers, and of course, a satisfied user base in general, as these firms have learnt to customise offerings across markets, and invest in after sales support as well. So much so that Chinese manufacturers have occupied the top 5 positions in inverter manufacturing since 2022, with a global share that exceeds 50% today. Add in the share of while labelled products exported around the world under different local brand names, and the share could be over 60%.

European and American brands like SMA, Enphase, Fimer, and even Israel’s SolarEdge have managed to keep the appearance of competition going, but all have been losing share to the Chinese upstarts due to significant price differentials. While the incentive for a Chinese firm to try and build an inbuilt backdoor is frankly none, considering the growth they are experiencing and the potential for much more, any aversion to Chinese inverters will not hurt developers or consumers as much as for modules, since the overall impact on project cost would be relatively limited. the inverter firms know it, and will probably have their work cut out if any more bad news comes out on security related issues.

China’s Majors Well Placed, Other Than Huawei 

Chinese firms Huawei, Sungrow, and Ginlong Solis lead the global inverter market. It doesn’t help that Huawei in particular has been under the lens for its telecom business for a long time, leading to a ban on its use in India, the US and Canada and UK,  for instance. It had earlier exited the US inverter market in 2019. In other words, it has the kind of reputation that marketing will struggle to fix in most key markets. Expect reluctance to use its inverters, directly or even white labeled, to grow further in more markets.

Others like Sungrow, Solis, Sineng, Goodwe, Growatt etc have enjoyed strong runs in recent years, and will probably go out of their way to dispel any doubts, considering the quality of management and global exposure they all have. All these firms are familiar names across markets today, with a good reputation to match. Sungrow even has a manufacturing presence in India. Beyond that, it is scaling up a strong storage division that has already achieved notable success in various parts of the world. These firms have built in the kind of scale and presence across markets to effectively counter any misinformation around their brands, in no small measure due to their large and mostly satisfied customer bases now. They appreciate the future value of the success of their brands and business.

Government’s At Work

In the US, attention has ironically been on batteries rather than inverters until now. Mainly due to the impossibility of avoiding Chinese products currently, thanks to the Chinese dominance of the battery supply chain, especially Lithium batteries. The Senate introduced the Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act, aimed at banning Homeland Security from buying batteries from six Chinese companies by 2027. In some other cases, utilities have announced plans to move away from Chinese inverters on their own.

India

In India, power electronics is expected to be a major focus area to build self sufficiency, constrained only by the high dependence on Chinese supplies for now. Targeting the same right now doesn’t make sense considering the restricted state of the local manufacturing eco system, even as the duty on imported inverters has been slapped on from 2021-22 and progressively raised to 20% to support local manufacturing. This was after withdrawing the concessional duty on solar power imports in 2021. With a high 40% rate on module imports, besides a recent anti dumping duty on solar glass as well, further rise in import duties on solar inverters would appear to be counter productive, especially when solar prices are not drawing in buyers as easily as earlier.

Europe Already Seeking Protection

European inverter majors have already been lobbying intensely for protection from Chinese players, in a repeat of the module manufacturing playbook that justifies it on energy security grounds.   The only thing holding back governments has been the huge price difference vis a vis Chinese products, going upto 3x in cases. With little complaints on quality or performance, there have been no compelling reasons to act.

Conclusion

Developers we tried to speak to also claim that they usually have their own firewalls to prevent any unauthorised communication. Expect stricter norms to be mandated for all in due course, besides more stringent checks and threats of punishments in case of missteps.

Perhaps most importantly, we might soon be looking at a situation where the Chinese government itself steps in to become a sort of guarantor for the bonafides of its manufacturers, as it has the most to lose in case of a crisis of confidence in its exports. That will mean a far more transparent and accessible regime for verifying quality and security checks.  Keep in mind that electronics exports as a category leads overall Chinese exports worldwide.

For China, being proactive would not be a bad thing at all, including offering Pharma-like access to foreign government inspections possibly. India knows it only too well, as firms have seen whenever a negative observation follows a US FDA inspection here. But being open has been a key part of its Pharma sector growing strongly. With most top Chinese firms listed on the stock exchanges, the implications of negative news is far higher than ever for them.

"Want to be featured here or have news to share? Write to info[at]saurenergy.com
      SUBSCRIBE NEWS LETTER
Scroll